🔗 Share this article

The recent US national security strategy offers a flawed view of Europe. It claims that unrestrained immigration and so-called "progressive" agendas represent an existential risk to European civilization. Yet, this perspective rests on a fundamental misreading of the reality. The actual danger facing Europe is not cultural but technological and economic backwardness.

The Stark Growth Divide Between the US and Europe

The data reveal a stark contrast. Between 2008 and 2023, US GDP grew by eighty-seven percent, compared to a mere thirteen and a half percent increase for the EU. During this period, EU GDP per capita dropped from over three-quarters to just half of the American figure. Strikingly, even Mississippi now boasts a greater average income than several leading EU nations like Italy and France.

Currently, about half of the global top fifty technology firms are American, while only four are European.

The Innovation Shortfall: A Critical Question

This widening economic gap stems from stronger efficiency gains in the US, largely due to breakthroughs and higher total factor productivity. The scene of world technology leadership is decidedly American. Over the past fifty years, 241 US firms have scaled into companies valued at more than $10bn, compared with just 14 in Europe.

This disparity prompts a vital issue: As the competition for tomorrow's sectors like semiconductors, AI, and quantum computing, what is Europe stand? Experts widely concede it is largely a contest between two between the US and China, with Europe starting at a significant disadvantage.

Underlying Factors of Europe's Technological Lag

Several major factors explain this technological divide.

• Financing Ecosystem: The United States has a far deeper and agile system for financing new ventures. Europe still lacks a true capital markets union, which caps the scale of emerging companies.
• Bureaucratic Hurdles: Complex and divided regulation hamper European business. A US startup can introduce a product under one regulatory framework to access a consumer base of hundreds of millions. The European Union, despite a bigger population size, is split among twenty-seven separate systems, creating huge market obstacles.
• Mindset Differences: Views on entrepreneurial failure vary greatly. In some EU nations, a startup's collapse was once met with penalties, whereas in the United States, it is often considered a valuable lesson.
• Military Investment: The US benefits from a tightly woven academic-military-industrial complex. Europe's chronic underinvestment in military capabilities has weakened its ability in breakthrough innovation.

The Road Ahead: Grounds for Cautious Optimism

Despite these challenges, one can find causes for hope. European leaders are growing more conscious of the existential challenge and have begun to advance serious reform. Key reports on European competitiveness and the single market point to the need for major changes.

With the right incentives and rule changes, Europe's strengths could support far greater levels of commercial innovation.

Europe retains significant strengths: high-quality human capital, top-tier schools and universities, and premier research institutions. Alongside a large internal market and substantial household savings, these elements could trigger a new wave of venture creation.

Crucially, even if the EU does not take the lead in creating cutting-edge technologies, it can still significantly increase economic output by adopting and adapting advancements from other regions.

An Inflection Point

Europe now stands at a decisive moment. To paraphrase a famous line, economic erosion often happens "gradually and then suddenly". To date, the continent's technological decline has been gradual. But, without decisive action to address its deep-seated problems, today's slow erosion could turn into a rapid and permanent loss of global economic relevance.